Radiometric dating artifact top commentators closed how to hook a guy in online dating
A majority of the tested rocks put forth ages of over a billion years, when in fact it was known that the rocks had been formed in very recent times.
Clementson stated that: Who would readily accept a method of dating when it is known and proven to be wildly inaccurate? It will not be admitted, in fact most likely denied, but the true method of dating which is always consulted is that of the Geologic Column (see article entitled, "Come, Let Us Reason In Circles Together").
Therefore any date achieved in this method will be in the margin of error because of a modulating amount of daughter component.
This quote is support to my point: "Processes of rock alteration may render a volcanic rock useless for potassium-argon dating.
The daughter component is Argon 40, and the process has a half-life of 1.3 billion years.
Also, simultaneously, using the "beta decay" (emission of an electron and a neutrino) Potassium 40 decays into Calcium 4.
To gain an index of time since the original formation of the system, you document the relative proportions of the two components.
Therefore, based on the certain amounts of the components in a sample, you can tell how old the sample is.
The function of this method is based on a chain of decay from Uranium and its sister element Thorium, into Lead and Helium. The positively charged atoms of helium gas, otherwise known as alpha particles, escape the nuclei of the parent atoms at rates which have been shown to be statistically constant.We have analyzed several devitrified glasses of known age, and all have yielded ages that are too young.Some gave virtually zero ages, although the geologic evidence suggested that devitrification took place shortly after the formation of a deposit." So if the actual contents and potassium are not concrete in existence, then it seems foolish to rely upon such a dating for accurate results. The main fact is this: All these are facts about the dating systems.Why should Uranium methods be assumed correct on rocks of an unknown age, when it is known that the methods are incorrect on rocks of a known age? This quote supports my point: "The most reasonable age can be selected only after careful consideration of independent geochronologic data as well as field, stratigraphic and paleontologic evidence, and the petrographic and paragenetic relations." Potassium-Argon method: The most widely used method for dating rocks is the Potassium-Argon method.
Found in igneous and sedimentary rocks, Potassium 40 minerals decay along the lines of "electron-capture" (the capture of an orbital electron by the nucleus).Despite the overwhelmingly dogmatic support from the textbook community, the methods are simply inconsistent in the answers they put forth.